Evaluation Rubrics

magnifying glass

Group Presentation Rubric

Content Evaluation Rubric

Journal Rubric

Return to Case 1.
Return to Case 2.
Return to Index.
Return to Introduction.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group Presentation Rubric

10

A commanding performance.
  • Good planning of who does what.
  • A well thought out script.
  • Appropriate volume and rate of presentation.
  • Good flow between group members.
  • Clear and concise speaking.
  • A well designed slide show.
  • Efficient use of time.

8

A good slide show.
  • Good planning of who does what.
  • Use of a script.
  • Appropriate volume and rate of presentation.
  • Clear and concise speaking.
  • A well designed slide show.

6

A slide show in need of improvements.
  • Little or no planning of who does what.
  • Appropriate volume.
  • Clear and concise speaking.
  • An OK slide show.

Return to Case 1.
Return to Case 2.
Return to top of page.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Content Evaluation Rubric

10

Thorough explanations of all the requirements of the activity.

8

Complete explanations of all the requirements of the activity.

6

Incomplete explanations of all the requirements of the activity.

Return to Case 1.
Return to Case 2.
Return to top of page.

 

 

 

 

 

Journal Evaluation Rubric

10

A complete and thorough log of all the searches.
  • A list of all URL's that gave useful information.
  • Detailed descriptions of all the strategies they used to find the sites.
  • Lists of brainstormed keywords.
  • Detailed explanations of why the sites are considered valid.

8

A complete log of all the searches.
  • A list of all URL's that gave useful information.
  • Descriptions of all the strategies they used to find the sites.
  • Lists of brainstormed keywords.
  • Explains why the sites are considered valid.

6

An incomplete log of all the searches.
  • A list of all the URL's that gave useful information.
  • Incomplete descriptions of the strategies they used to find the sites.
  • Lists of brainstormed keywords.
  • Incomplete explanations of why the sites are considered valid.

Return to Case 1.
Return to Case 2.
Return to top of page.