|
Analytical Rubric to Assess Historical and
Social Science Thinking |
|
|
- 1
- Incomplete
|
- 2
- In Progress
|
- 3
Fluent
|
4
Exemplary |
|
Relating Historical Events,
People, Eras |
- does not use comparison and contrast
appropriately
- does not draw conclusions
- does not relate past to present
|
- limited use of comparison and contrast
- draws some conclusions
- sometimes relates past to present
|
- uses comparison and contrast appropriately
- draws a conclusion
- relates past to present
|
- demonstrates extensive use of comparison
and contrast
- draws insightful conclusions
|
|
Analyzing Cause and Effect |
- does not sequence events
- does not tell how events relate
- does not analyze cause and effect
|
- puts few events in a sequence
- tells how some events relate to each
other
- analyzes some causes and effects
|
- puts events in a sequence
- tells how events relate to each other
- analyzes multiple causes and effects
|
- shows extensive understanding of relationships
- provides insight into cause and effect
|
|
Using Multiple Perspectives |
- does not examine issues from other
points of view
- does not analyze, summarize, and compare
views
|
- examines some issues from other points
of view
- analyzes, summarizes, and compares
few different points of view
|
- examines issues from other points of
view
- analyzes, summarizes, and compares
different points of view
|
- demonstrates a clear and extensive
understanding of multiple perspectives
|
|
Defending a Position |
- cannot take a point of view
- does not form logical arguments
- does not support arguments with evidence
- does not show knowledge of other points
of view
|
- researches a topic and arrives at a
limited interpretation
- forms some logical arguments
- supports arguments with limited evidence
- shows some knowledge of other points
of view
|
- researches a topic and arrives at an
interpretation
- can take a point of view
- forms a logical argument
- supports arguments with evidence
- shows knowledge of other points of
view
|
- conducts extensive research
- arguments or statements are supported
with ample fact and detail
- clearly understands all points of view
|
|
Interpreting Data |
- cannot put data in own words,
or explain meaning
- cannot relate data to context
- does not evaluate reliability of data
- does not interpret data
- does not use appropriate tools for
interpretation
|
- can put some data in own words
- can relate data to a limited context
- limited evaluation of reliability of
data
- forms limited interpretation of the
data
- uses some tools for interpretation
|
- can put data in own words, explains
meaning
- can relate data to context
- evaluates reliability of data
- forms an interpretation of data
- uses appropriate tools for interpretation
|
- can clearly relate data to its context
and other contexts
- interprets data in an insightful manner
- extensively uses graphs, charts, etc.,
to interpret and analyze data
|