jump to contentsacramento state - masters of educational technology  
sac state homeadmissionsabout sac stategiving a giftsite indexcontact us

about imet cohorts faculty resources research portfolios imet classic teacher education

iMET 10 Assignment


blogforumtapped in
Schedule

iMet: Internet Masters of Educational Technology

283 Staff Development and Presentation Application

Tapped In: Evaluating Staff Development

11/01/07



Introduction

At the EDTE 282/283 face-to-face meeting, each group will deliver a 30 minute presentation to the Staff Development Committee (SDC), consisting of a 5 minute overview and a 25 minute illustrative example of the actual training. The audience (cohort members and instructors) play the role of the SDC. The main task of SDC is to evaluate the staff development proposal and to provide written critical feedback for both the proposal and the presentation. The purpose of this assignment is to assist in the development the fundamental concepts of staff development evaluation. Link to Final Project description.

Preparation for Jigsaw:

Facilitator Reads: The age of our accountability: evaluation must become an integral part of staff development
http://www.nsdc.org/library/publications/jsd/guskey194.cfm

Recorder Reads: 8 smooth steps: solid footwork makes evaluation of staff development programs a song
http://www.nsdc.org/library/publications/jsd/JKillion244.pdf

Timekeeper Reads: Taking measure: map out evaluation goals
http://www.nsdc.org/library/publications/jsd/champion234.pdf

Evaluator Reads:
NSDC Standards for Staff Development

 

Discussion Objectives
In the facilitator's office, each group member summarizes their assigned reading for the group. Discuss any points that could be used to improve your group's product/presentation.
What do you think are the most important criteria for a successful staff development presentation? List and describe in detail at least five criteria, in priority order, from most important to least important. Are there any modifications that your group will make to your product/presentation based on tonight's discussion?

Again, the purpose of this assignment is to provide you some fundamental ideas. While we may not use or apply all of the guidelines or steps mentioned for final evaluations, these readings provide background information to help guide your thinking as you develop your own presentation and prepare to evaluate the presentations at F2F.

Recorder: writes the summary and posts the group's response to the forum.


Agenda

7:00 Arrival and greetings in JoyceED's office
7:05 - 7:15 Check-in
7:15 - 8:00 Small Group Discussions
8:00 - 8:15 Break
8:15 - 9:15 Continue Small Group Discussions
9:15 - 9:30 Wrap and post response for the group to the forum.
(Recorder: summarize responses and post to the forum.)



   

Groups and Roles:

  • Facilitator: host the meeting in your Tapped In office, keep the group on task and on topic, and help to ensure that all group members have a chance to be a part of the discussion.
  • Timekeeper: keep the group on time and aid the facilitator in ensuring that all members have a chance to be a part of the discussion.
  • Recorder: take notes during the discussion and prepare the summary.
  • Evaluator-critic: measures group's actions against an objective standard.
Brandon, Glenda, Olivia, Elvia t, f, r, e
Wendy E, Louis, Kathy, John M t, f, r, e
Rose, Kathleen, John C t, f, r, e-all
Joseph, Tim, Wendi T, Naomi t, f, r, e
Corinne, Cheryl, Wendy L, Jenny t, f, r, e

 


Instructor
Joyce Dibble