Purpose:
This project was designed to fulfill the requirements for our Web Quest
project assignment. Chris Clark, Chris Watson, Kay Carlile, and
Ashleigh Hoslett developed this activity. There are many reasons
that people become activists: they are driven by internal and external
forces that motivate them to make life changing and sometimes life threatening
decisions. The students in this activity are beginning a research
project not only into the history of our Founding Fathers, but also
into their own futures and values. The students are to investigate
what drove the founding fathers to become activists and to risk being
hung in the name of independence. Then the students are to investigate
other historical figures that are considered activists and determine
what drove them to become activists. Finally, the students are
to look at the issues which are important to them and how they can become
involved. Potentially, this lesson is one which could produce
a life long change in a student. By investigating issues which
are important to them, the students may themselves become activists
one day.
Use:
We have not yet been able to utilize this project because of time constraints,
but I am planning to go back to this activity later in the year, when
I talk more about activism.
Modification:
There were some minor errors that have been corrected based on peer
review that we received..
There are some changes I would like to implement with my students, because
the activity may be a little difficult for some of my lower performing
students.
Peer Review:
When we decided to use this project for the product section, the link
to the site was posted to the list server, and a request was sent out
to other colleagues in the teaching profession who worked at various
schools with differing numbers of years teaching. Instead of coming
up with a complex question and answer Likert scale review for these
teachers to use, we simply asked them these few questions:
1. What do you think of these web pages as a teacher looking for activities
your class?
2.What are your thoughts on the accessibility of these web pages for
your students? For yourself?
3.What do you like about these pages?
4.How can we improve them for the students?
Here are several comments that our colleagues made about the program:
Chris Crowe is a Language Arts and 8th grade US History teacher at Foothill
Farms Junior High.
"This program on the Declaration of Independence is thorough and
detailed. Instructions are explained step by step and a scoring
rubric is provided as a check for student progress. Links are
quick and easy. It would have been nice to have sound bites of
the protest music. Overall this is a clear and organized presentation".
Kim Harrison IMET2 member and Mono County Office of Education representative.
"A very small detail---can you make the font on the Intro and subsequent
pages larger? It is small and with italics, hard to read. The
colors are very appealing and easy to read--if the font were either
not italicized and a sans serif, or a bit larger. I like the yellow
background and blue lettering. The appearance is very sharp and
clean.
I like how you guide the students through the pages by using the "next"
arrow--it keeps them moving forward! At first, I thought that
you would need a back arrow, but realized that they could simply click
on the navigation bar on the left if needed.
On your Process page---good idea to give the students choices for presentations
depending upon the technology available. I think so often,
those of us who use technology don't always realize that it is not readily
available everywhere!
A couple of minor details on this page-----Under group presentation,
first paragraph: "After you have gather" it should read "gathered"
On the resources page (quite an extensive list here!!)---you could do
a mini-tech activity on effective searching so that you are not turning
the students loose on the Internet to find other resources. This
is only a suggestion.
I like the simplicity of your webquest, Chris. It is really nice.
You could add some more historical graphics just to spice it up
a bit (the Library of Congress has a website to obtain these), but that
is not really necessary. Your webquest has a nice flow and the
content is very strong and solid.
Finally, on your teacher page, I like that you have added the EL element.
I think this is often overlooked when we create these projects.
Also, I did not see where you addressed particular content standards.
You may want to include that on the teacher page as well."
Dave
Amacker- retired teacher of 30 plus years.
"The program is based on a comparison of the past to the present
life in America. This whole program could easily be written to
include any and all parts of world history as well. As an example,
the rise of the dictators before World War II and the current social
and economic problems in Europe today. The project that students
are to complete in this program will bring them into focus with problems
in the United States under English occupation to problems that still
persist in the United States today. Again, I experienced problems
downloading some to the information in your program. Perhaps it
is due in part to the computer that I am using - I would hope so. Over
all, I would think that students would find this to be an exciting and
worthwhile project for them to delve into. I think that students
would find this to be of much more interest to them rather than listening
to a teacher's lecture, reading several "boring" pages in
a textbook, answering some questions, taking a quiz over the material
only to forget all of that information in a matter of days. This
project should be able to make lasting affect on the students especially
when thinking of the world that they now live in."
Modifications based on peer review:
There have been no substantial modifications. However, as the Web Quest
is used in a variety of classrooms there will be, undoubtably, modifications
made to the project.
Presentation:
We have presented this to our IMET2 partners, and in addition, it was
part of a presentation on effective web design at the Cue conference.
It went over well in this venue.
Faculty Review:
Reviewed by Bruce McVicker:
Chris W., Chris C., Ashleigh, and Kay,
"Wonderful work!
The product certainly seems to be an engaging one. I think the
political action component provides a powerful, reflective activity
that may transfer to a number of activities through the students
school lives. Very well done.
You four have also embedded some nice additions that set a nice environment
for study. Using music in the background is a clever piece.
The format is clear and inviting. Step-by-step procedures will
help your students proceed through this quest with ease, enabling them
to concentrate on the problem-solving and critical thinking tasks.
Great scaffolds!
The product shows a great deal of thought. You should think about
presenting this at the CapCUE in the spring. Teachers need to
know about your work.
Well done,"
Bruce
Collaboration:
In this activity, Chris Clark led the group through his construction
of the web site. The rest of us focused on retrieving the web
resources along with the sites Chris Clark already had found.
As a group, we worked on the construction of the assessment.
Research:
Bibliography
Dede, C., & Sprague, D. (1999). If I teach this way, am I doing
my job? Constructivism in the classroom [Internet web site]. International
Society for Technology in Education. Retrieved July 15, 2001, 2001,
from the World Wide Web: http://www.iste.org/L&L/archive/vol27/no1/feature/
Milbury, P. (1997). Collaborating on internet-based lessons: A teacher
and librarian score with pbl. Technology Connection, 4(5), 2.
Seamon, M. (2001). Changing instructional practices through technology
training. Book Report, 19(5), 3.
Yoder, M. B. (1999). The student webquest. Learning and Leading with
Technology. Available: http://www.iste.org/L&L/archive/vol26/no7/features/yoder/index.html
[2001, October 17th].