|
Criteria |
Standards |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
10 |
15 | 20 | ||
|
Development Process
|
Handwritten proposal sheet submitted to teacher |
Draft page is printed out from within Netscape; text on page partially achieves proposal |
Evidence of revision of page in web browser (Netscape, Explorer); substantially achieves (or explains changes to) proposal |
Critical reflection of development process is submitted in writing (individually) |
|
Writing Process
|
Difficult to understand, tangents, spelling and other errors |
Easy to understand; perfect spelling; one or two grammar, syntax, or semantic problems |
Same as Level 3 but no errors |
Clear, concise, well written |
|
Layout
|
The pages are unattractive. Text is difficult to read. The backgrounds are distracting. |
The pages appear "busy" or "boring". Text may be difficult to read. The backgrounds are somewhat distracting. |
The pages are eye-catching and attractive. Text is easy to read. The backgrounds are subtle and appropriate |
The pages are well organized with tables. Text spacing and alignment make reading easy. The backgrounds enhance the page. |
|
Navigation
|
The user may become lost or links may be missing or not working. |
The user may become confused when navigating between pages. Some links may not work. |
Links are consistent and easy to find so that the user can easily navigate back and forth through pages. |
Links are created with images and icons to enhance the text links. |
|
Images
|
No images |
Photos are blurry or fuzzy; icons and clip art do not "fit" with the topic. Too many pictures make the download time slow. |
Photos, icons, and clip art are appropriate, of high quality, and download fairly quickly. |
Photos, icons, and clip art are used creatively and may follow a theme. |
| Question Quality | Questions are often yes / no or only drew brief response with little follow-up or prodding for fuller answers. | Questions could be more connected with more follow-up; answers tend to be brief. | Questions drew out adequate answers with some follow-up and connection between them | Questions drew out full answers and incomplete answers had follow-up questions; answers were full/complete. |
Back to Top Student-Rubric Word Version of Client Rubric
Source: This Rubric is a modified version of two that were
created by
John Pilgrim, SW Computer Electives, Fall 1995, Horace Mann MS.
You can find the original version at his web site:
http://nisus.sfusd.k12.ca.us/schwww/sch618/jwp/pilgrim_links.html
and:
Tammy Worcester
Instructional Technology Specialist
The original can be found at the following web site:
http://www.essdack.org/tips/webpagerubric.html