WEB QUEST

WEB SITE DESIGN

Introduction Task Process Resources Evaluation Conclusion

Client Web Page Evaluation Rubric

Criteria

Standards

5

10

15 20

Development Process

 

Handwritten proposal sheet submitted to teacher

Draft page is printed out from within Netscape; text on page partially achieves proposal

Evidence of revision of page in web browser (Netscape, Explorer); substantially achieves (or explains changes to) proposal

Critical reflection of development process is submitted in writing (individually)

Writing Process

 

Difficult to understand, tangents, spelling and other errors

Easy to understand; perfect spelling; one or two grammar, syntax, or semantic problems

Same as Level 3 but no errors

Clear, concise, well written

Layout

 

The pages are unattractive. Text is difficult to read. The backgrounds are distracting.

The pages appear "busy" or "boring". Text may be difficult to read. The backgrounds are somewhat distracting.

The pages are eye-catching and attractive. Text is easy to read. The backgrounds are subtle and appropriate

The pages are well organized with tables. Text spacing and alignment make reading easy. The backgrounds enhance the page.

Navigation

 

The user may become lost or links may be missing or not working.

The user may become confused when navigating between pages. Some links may not work.

Links are consistent and easy to find so that the user can easily navigate back and forth through pages.

Links are created with images and icons to enhance the text links.

Images

 

No images

Photos are blurry or fuzzy; icons and clip art do not "fit" with the topic. Too many pictures make the download time slow.

Photos, icons, and clip art are appropriate, of high quality, and download fairly quickly.

Photos, icons, and clip art are used creatively and may follow a theme.

Question Quality Questions are often yes / no or only drew brief response with little follow-up or prodding for fuller answers. Questions could be more connected with more follow-up; answers tend to be brief. Questions drew out adequate answers with some follow-up and connection between them Questions drew out full answers and incomplete answers had follow-up questions; answers were full/complete.

Back to Top          Student-Rubric    Word Version of Client Rubric

Source: This Rubric is a modified version of two that were created by
John Pilgrim, SW Computer Electives, Fall 1995, Horace Mann MS.
You can find the original version at his web site:
http://nisus.sfusd.k12.ca.us/schwww/sch618/jwp/pilgrim_links.html
and:
Tammy Worcester
Instructional Technology Specialist
The original can be found at the following web site:
http://www.essdack.org/tips/webpagerubric.html